Four topics, six wines

Topic Wines Focus
Terroir: what does the science support? Two Chardonnays: same variety, same winemaker, different soils Reviewing the evidence for soil mineral transfer vs indirect mechanisms. The terroir concept as observed fact vs contested mechanism.
Minerality: volatile sulphur compounds and perception Chablis Premier Cru vs Clare Valley Riesling DMS, thiols and the chemistry behind "wet stone" and "flint" descriptors. Why the soil explanation is scientifically unsupported.
Oak: tannin, vanilla and oxygen Same Rioja wine — unoaked vs new oak Ellagitannins from oak vs grape tannins. Micro-oxygenation and its effect on colour stability. The flavour compounds lactones, vanillin and eugenol.
Tannin: astringency, polymerisation and time Young Barolo vs 10-year-old Barolo The chemistry of astringency: tannin-protein binding. How tannin polymerises with age and why old wines feel "softer". What bottle ageing actually does.

Why science matters in wine

Wine communication is full of concepts that are accepted as fact but rest on shaky scientific foundations — mineral flavour transfer from soil, the superiority of wild yeast fermentation, the idea that organic viticulture automatically produces better wine. This lecture takes a different approach: presenting what peer-reviewed research actually shows about the mechanisms behind widely discussed wine concepts, and exploring where the evidence supports received wisdom and where it contradicts it. The goal is not to deflate romanticism but to sharpen understanding — knowing that "minerality" likely reflects volatile sulphur compounds and acidity rather than literal soil minerals doesn\'t make a great Chablis any less compelling; it just means you understand it better. See terroir and minerality for pre-reading.

Event details correct at time of publication. Verify with the organiser before booking. Last updated: 2026-10-22. Corrections via the contact form.